| Item 6 Anchor Papers | |||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anchor Papers ~ Algebra/Data Analysis ~ Item 6
|
Score Level 1 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates little attempt to apply a reasonable strategy. Although the answers for the mean, median, and mode are all correct, the student does not address the next part of the question concerning the amount of money a consumer must spend. The response addressing the data point of 26 shows a serious flaw in reasoning. The student indicates that both the mean and the median will be greatly changed by leaving out data point 26, when actually the median does not change at all. No valid justification is given for this answer. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 1 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates little attempt to apply a reasonable strategy. The mode is correct; however, the mean and median are both incorrect. No response to the second part of the question is provided. The student correctly states that the mean will be more affected by ignoring the data point 26, but no justification is given. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 1 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates little attempt to apply a reasonable strategy. The correct answers are given for the mean and median but the mode is not provided. No response to the second or third parts of the question is given. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 2 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy. The answers for the mean, median, and mode are all correct. The amount of money a consumer must spend ($14) is not based on a measure of central tendency and is the least amount of money it would take to receive all five game pieces. The student correctly states that removing data point 26 would have a greater influence on the mean and justifies by stating what the mean and median would be if 26 were ignored. The response shows a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 2 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy. Although both the mean and the median are correct, no mode is provided. A correct answer based on the mean is given for the amount of money a consumer must spend; however, no justification is supplied. The student correctly states that ignoring data point 26 will have a greater effect on the mean, and the justification (it will decreas it) supports the solution but does not address the median. The response shows a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 2 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy. The answers for the mean, median, and mode are all correct. Although a correct answer ($25.20) is given for the amount of money a consumer would have to spend, no justification is provided. The student correctly states that removing data point 26 would have a greater influence on the mean. The justification is fully developed (the mean because it would be signaficantly lower, while the median would still be 9). The response shows a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 3 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The answers for the mean, median, and mode are all correct. The response to the amount of money a consumer must spend ($28) is a correct answer. The justification uses a number that falls in between the three measures of central tendency ($2.80 × 10). The student correctly chooses the mean as the measure that will be most influenced if data point 26 is ignored. The justification is clearly presented and fully developed (the median stays the same even if the 26 is taken out. It is still 9. However the mean changes from 10.7 to 9.9). The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|
Score Level 3 Anchor Paper |
|
This response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The answers for the mean, median, and mode are all correct. The response to the amount of money a consumer must spend contains two correct answers and a fully developed justification. The answer ($29.96) is justified by stating that this would be the cost using the mean, and the answer ($25.20) is justified by stating that this is the cost using the median or mode. The student correctly chooses the mean as the measure that will be most affected if data point 26 is ignored and provides a fully developed justification. (The median stayed the same, but the mean changed by a difference of .81.) The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. ![]() |
|