School Improvement in Maryland
Public Release Item Scoring Information Return

Goal 2 Geometry, Measurement, And Reasoning

Expectation 2.1 The student will represent and analyze two- and three-dimensional figures using tools and technology when appropriate.

Indicator 2.1.1 The student will analyze the properties of geometric figures.

Assessment Limits:

  • Essential properties, relationships, and geometric models include the following:
    • Congruence and similarity
    • line/segment/plane relationships (parallel, perpendicular, intersecting, bisecting, midpoint, median, altitude)
    • point relationships (collinear, coplanar)
    • angles and angle relationships (vertical, adjacent, complementary, supplementary, obtuse, acute, right, interior, exterior)
    • angle relationships with parallel lines
    • polygons (regular, non-regular, composite, equilateral, equiangular)
    • geometric solids (cones, cylinders, prisms, pyramids, composite figures)
    • circle/sphere (tangent, radius, diameter, chord, secant, central/inscribed angle, inscribed, circumscribed).

Extended Constructed Response (ECR) Item - Released in 2001

The Department of Public Works wants to put a water treatment plant at a point that is an equal distance from each of the three towns it will service. The location of each of the towns is shown below.

Use the answer box to complete the following. (You will also need to use additional paper to complete the answer satisfactorily.)

  • Locate the point that is an equal distance from each of the towns.
     
  • Explain how you determined this location. Use words, symbols, or both in your explanation.
     
  • Use mathematics to justify your answer.

The following 9 Anchor Papers represent a range of score points and are used in conjunction with the rubrics to assess student responses.

Anchor Paper #1

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #1: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is incorrect. The diagram and explanation reveal that the student applied an inappropriate strategy of finding the medians to locate the position of the water treatment plant. Arc marks are present for the perpendicular bisectors, but the perpendicular bisectors were used to locate the midpoints between the towns. There is no justification.


Anchor Paper #2

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #2: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is fundamentally correct; the point is close, but not correct. There is little evidence of a correct strategy. The student has stated the point would be located where "the measure of the length of each line would be the same," but this strategy was not employed as the lines do not all have the same measure. There is no justification.


Anchor Paper #3

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #3: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is correct; the student has correctly located the point where the water treatment plant should be. The student has "basically used trial and error." While not the best method to locate the point, trial and error is an acceptable strategy if the concept of equidistance is applied. There is no justification.


Anchor Paper #4

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #4: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is fundamentally correct. The point is close, but not correct. The diagram and explanation reveal that the student has applied an incomplete correct strategy of using the concept of a circle's radius to find a point equidistant from all three towns. There is no justification.


Anchor Paper #5

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #5: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is fundamentally correct; the point is close, but not correct. The arc marks reveal incomplete application of a reasonable strategy to construct perpendicular bisectors. The explanation of the strategy provides no further indication of a complete reasonable strategy. There is no justification.


Anchor Paper #6

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #6: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is essentially correct; the point is close without being exact. The diagram and explanation reveal that the student has applied a reasonable strategy of "using perpendicular bisectors" to find the location of the water treatment plant. However, the explanation for finding the perpendicular bisector is missing. Justification is provided in the statement, "Each side has a perpendicular bisector. I got all of them and found out where they intersected. This point is equidistant from all three towns."


Anchor Paper #7

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #7: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is correct; the student has successfully located the point designating the location of the water treatment plant. At least two complete sets of arc marks provide a full explanation of a correct strategy employing perpendicular bisectors. Justification is incomplete. There is neither support of the equidistance with measurement, nor has it been conveyed that the perpendicular bisectors, not just the bisectors, provide the point that is equidistant from the three towns.


Anchor Paper #8

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #8: Rubric Score 4

Annotation: This response demonstrates complete understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is correct. A fully developed explanation of a reasonable strategy to locate the position of the water treatment plant is provided in the arc marks as well as a full description. Full justification is provided in the statement, "where all of the bisectors intersected is the point equidistant from each town."


Anchor Paper #9

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #9: Rubric Score 4

Annotation: This response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. The representation is correct, indicating the correct location of the water treatment plant. Full explanation of a complete correct strategy is present, with at least two complete sets of arc marks. Full justification of the correct location is supported by measure, "It is 4½ cm from each town."


Extended Constructed Response (ECR) Rubric

Print: Scoring Rubric (pdf)
Score 4

The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The representations are correct. The explanation and/or justification is logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed, supports the solution, and does not contain significant mathematical errors. The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem.

Score 3

The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a correct solution. The representations are essentially correct. The explanation and/or justification is generally well developed, feasible, and supports the solution. The response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem.

Score 2

The response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a correct solution. The representations are fundamentally correct. The explanation and/or justification supports the solution and is plausible, although it may not be well developed or complete. The response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem.

Score 1

The response indicates little or no application of a reasonable strategy. It may or may not have the correct answer. The representations are incomplete or missing. The explanation and/or justification reveals serious flaws in reasoning. The explanation and/or justification may be incomplete or missing. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem.

Score 0

The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response, or the response may state, “I don't know.”

Explanation refers to the student using the language of mathematics to communicate how the student arrived at the solution.

Justification refers to the student using mathematical principles to support the reasoning used to solve the problem or to demonstrate that the solution is correct. This could include the appropriate definitions, postulates and theorems.

Essentially correct representations may contain a few minor errors such as missing labels, reversed axes, or scales that are not uniform.

Fundamentally correct representations may contain several minor errors such as missing labels, reversed axes, or scales that are not uniform.

Last Revised 8/16/00

/share/clg/xml/public_release/mathematics/2001_211_geo43.xml
Resources for 2.1.1:
Skill Statements | PUBLIC RELEASE ITEMS | Lesson Plans |