School Improvement in Maryland
Public Release Item Scoring Information Return

Goal 1 Political Systems

Expectation 1.2 The student will evaluate how the United States government has maintained a balance between protecting rights and maintaining order.

Indicator 1.2.2 The student will analyze legislation designed to protect the rights of individuals and groups and to promote equity in American society.

Assessment Limits:

  • Legislation that addresses the rights of individuals and groups: minority and women’s rights, civil rights (affirmative action), and Native American rights.
  • Legislation that addresses immigration policies.
  • Information about the legislation will be provided in the item.

Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Item - Released in 2001

Use the chart below to answer the following:

Look at the cartoon below.

  • Explain how the point of view expressed in the cartoon contrasts with the intent of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • Include details to support your answer.

Write your answer in the answer box below.

The following 9 Anchor Papers represent a range of score points and are used in conjunction with the rubrics to assess student responses.

Anchor Paper #1

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #1: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response is related to the question but shows only minimal knowledge of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A fragment of a basic idea is presented (harder for women to get to the top of a business), but that idea is incomplete.


Anchor Paper #2

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #2: Rubric Score 1

Annotation: This response is related to the question but shows only minimal knowledge of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Basic ideas are attempted (separating the men from the women, woman being discriminated against based on gender), but the fragments of ideas are incomplete.


Anchor Paper #3

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #3: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response shows knowledge of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A complete key idea is provided (the Civil Rights Act...contrasts with the cartoon's view point of women having harder times getting career opportunities).


Anchor Paper #4

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #4: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response shows knowledge of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Basic key ideas are presented (women being given a way to the top but it's much harder than the man's, the intentions of the Act are to give both men and women an "elevator") and provided with a little support (based on what they can do, not on the fact that they are male or female).


Anchor Paper #5

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #5: Rubric Score 2

Annotation: This response shows knowledge of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Key ideas (the government is saying that the women get the same treatment as men, the stairs depict that it is harder to reach level 43 career opportunities for women) are provided with a little support (women have to try harder to get to the same place, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not what it seems).


Anchor Paper #6

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #6: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response shows some understanding of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Concepts are accurate and supported (the Act...intended to forbid discrimination, this cartoon expresses how hard it is for women to make progress in their careers), and some evidence of higher order thinking skills is demonstrated by the effective use of relevant example (unequal pay for equal work) and application of analysis and evaluation (expecting to find the same easy progress, stairs show the struggle involved because of her gender).


Anchor Paper #7

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #7: Rubric Score 3

Annotation: This response shows some understanding of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accurate concepts are supported (women are still having a hard time with career opportunities, this represents discrimination), and the application of related concepts (make women and minorities equal to white males) and evaluation (the cartoonist does not think the legislation was effective) provide some evidence of higher order thinking skills.


Anchor Paper #8

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #8: Rubric Score 4

Annotation: This response shows understanding of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Concepts are accurate and well supported (this violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because it involves discrimination towards females in employment), and powerful evidence of higher order thinking skills is demonstrated by insightful and integrated application of analysis and evaluation (this gives the men an unfair advantage), related concepts (women and minorities are fighting for equal rights), use of relevant example (blacks and women may now vote), and recognition of evolving contemporary conditions (this is a delicate subject in today's United States, although laws have improved situations...there is still more work to be done).


Anchor Paper #9

image of student response

Score for Anchor Paper #9: Rubric Score 4

Annotation: This response shows understanding of gender discrimination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accurate concepts are well supported and integrated (discriminating against women, two separate elevators, men are reaching jobs more easily than women). The response shows powerful evidence of higher order thinking skills by application of relevant governmental concepts (unconstitutional), extensive analysis and evaluation (separate elevators [are] unconstitutional because there is now no such thing as "separate but equal," it is much easier and faster to go on an elevator to the 43rd floor than it would be to walk), and cause and effect reasoning (the workplace is trying to drive women away by making them do a lot more work than men to receive the same job).


Brief Constructed Response (BCR) Rubric

Print: Scoring Rubric (pdf)
Score 4

This response shows understanding of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is insightful, integrates knowledge, and demonstrates powerful application.

  • The application shows powerful evidence of higher order thinking skills.
  • Concepts are accurate and well supported.
  • There are no misconceptions.
  • The response is comprehensive.
Score 3

This response shows some understanding of the content, question, and/or problem. The response includes appropriate application that demonstrates evidence of higher order thinking skills.

  • The application shows some evidence of higher order thinking skills.
  • Concepts are accurate and supported.
  • There are no interfering misconceptions.
  • The response may not develop all parts equally.
Score 2

This response shows knowledge of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is acceptable with some key ideas. The response shows little or no evidence of application.

  • The response includes some basic ideas.
  • The response provides little or no support.
  • There are minimal misconceptions.
Score 1

This response shows minimal knowledge of the content, question, and/or problem. The response is related to the question, but it is inadequate.

  • The response includes incomplete or fragmented ideas or knowledge.
  • There may be significant misconceptions.
Score 0

The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response.

Knowledge and Understanding indicate the degree to which the response reflects a grasp of the content, question, and/or problem presented in the stimulus. The response indicates mastery that progresses from knowledge to understanding.

Last Revised June 2001

/share/clg/xml/public_release/government/2001_122_gov27.xml